Monthly Archives: April 2007

Template for Sorrow

The massacre at Virginia Tech in April has somehow achieved a disturbing normalcy for North Americans. As horrific as it is, somehow it now fails to shock. We seem to expect no less from American society (or Canadian society to a lesser extent – because we are not without our own sins in this area).A template for sorrow seems to be appearing – the bewildered roommates anxious to give their version of the story, the long shots of trembling hands clasped in prayer with heads bowed, tears streaming down the faces of the affected students, the flowers and memorials, the media converging like locusts to interrogate the survivors. Perhaps we have all just accepted that this is the new norm in the 21st century?
Then there is the inevitable handwringing and finger pointing: movie and TV violence, video games, violent pornography, liberal parents. As a Canadian you may think, as I do, finally perhaps, the Americans will do something about the proliferation of guns, the easy access to firearms, the speed with which you can acquire a gun despite your past criminal or medical history. There is always a brief tumult of emotion and angst in the media, denials from the NRA and conservative politicians about the need for gun control and then … nothing, absolutely nothing.And as a writer, you start to wonder how much the homicidal rantings of the killer on paper in his writing classes fueled his behavior – did it provide the impetus to act or was it “merely” a manifestation of his disturbed mind? Certainly those writing professors who read his work at Virginia Tech were sufficiently disturbed to try and intercede on some level but to no avail.

I recall in past writing groups or workshops reading the work of fellow classmates in which there was pretty disturbing material – fairly explicit depictions of rapes, torture or murders. Does it become a safety valve for certain writers? To commit the act on paper eliminates the need to commit the act? We, the primarily female readers of the work, all tiptoed around the writers in our critiques. In all instances the writers were male (I’m not making a comment on the male psyche here, that’s just how it happened to be in these particular instances). One writer was, I’m not making this up, a postal service employee and perceived to be quite strange.

And I always thought how odd, if a fellow female writer wrote an explicit story about disfiguring a male, or killing a male, or torturing a male, the rest of group would be very disturbed, quite anxious. Would we be more vocal in our critiques?

The women in the writing groups remained quietly diplomatic in their analysis, perhaps there was a raised eyebrow or two and a look that passed around the room amongst the women. No one wanted to appear to be a prude or over react to the work – in most instances the writer himself appeared normal enough, whatever that means, and, I seem to recall, a little bit surprised if someone raised the issue of the gratuitous nature of the violence. What did we do when we read the disturbing stories … we raised our eyebrows, looked covertly at each other in a meaningful way, muted our comments and shrugged. Why, because, secretly, we think this is what men are? That this what they, not so secretly, think about?Of course, one can never know when the creator of the work is merely expressing him or herself or quietly setting the stage for future actions (obviously in almost all instances they are not acting on these ideas). I think that whether the writer acts on his or her impulse or not, his ability to put it down on paper will not push him in one direction or another to create a horrifying scenario such as we witnessed in Virginia.

But why this propensity in Americans specifically? Violence is not particular to America only. Open a newspaper on any page or read the headline on any news website … But why do such specific, formulaic explosions of violence occur there specifically in a school setting? To perpetrate violent crimes against people who really have no bearing on how you have lived, or suffered, in your life? Americans are, indisputably, the most indulged, most privileged people on the plant earth with the highest, most unrealistic expectations of success, fame and wealth (even the transplanted “nationals” such as the Virginia Tech killer Cho). And with such an inflated sense of what they can, or should accomplish, when they fail in the most mediocre way as we all do, every day of our lives (we can’t find a girlfriend, we are not the best in class, we didn’t get the job we wanted, we have trouble making friends, we hate our roommates, our lives are boring), they seem to want to register their misery in the most graphic and explosive way possible. To ensure that when they go down they will go out in a blaze of glory.

Literally.

The Margaret Atwood Dystopian Future Vs. Spam Email Contest

Lies With The Occasional Truth presents:

“The Margaret Atwood Dystopian Future Vs. Spam Email Contest

Inspired by a popular reference in their submission guidelines, MADFVSEC asks you to imagine a terrifying future society like those found in Margaret Atwood’s classic novels The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx & Crake.

This dystopian future, however, must be accurately described by the subject line of a well-known spam e-mail. Consolidate Your Debt, Increase Penis Size Now, and Urgent Request From Kenyan Bank Executive are all acceptable titles for your daring piece of speculative fiction.”
contestlogo.jpg

Continue reading

Descant Arts and Letters Foundation presents: 136-A Trompe l’Oeil Calender, Spring Issue Launch!

Wednesday, May 16, 2007 @7:30pm
La Cervejaria: 842 College Street
Copies of our new volume, 136: A Trompe l’Oeil Calender, will be available for purchase at this free event!

Come and join us in Little Italy for an exciting evening of readings to celebrate the debut of Descant’s spring issue. Come raise a glass to an outstanding artistic achievement in the company of fellow lovers of lit!

Featuring performances by five up-and-coming authors:

Christine Fischer Guy
John B. Lee
Charles Meanwell
Bernadette Rule
Ewan Whyte

ph: 416-593-2557 www.descant.ca/subscribe.html

136-cover-lrg.jpg

For all the fools and all the defeated

And the dreams that you have, alone in an empty room, waiting for the door that will open, the thing that is bound to happen … Good Morning, Midnight (1939)

Jean Rhys (1890-1979), born in Dominica in the West Indies, seems to have always existed on the periphery of literary greatness. Few seem to know her but those that do often love her work (I am one of those devotees – we are an ardent and devoted sect). I was reminded of her again when reading Heather O’Neill’s book Lullabies for Little Criminals as she cites Rhys as one of her influences. Her work has been described as “more or less autobiographical” and often dealt with the theme of a helpless female, an outsider, an alcoholic, who is “victimized by her dependence on an older man for support and protection”. More biographical info is available on the link above.

Lovely, troubled, and nomadic, she flitted restlessly throughout England and Europe. She moved to England at the age of sixteen and studied briefly at the Academy of Dramatic Art in London. Rather than return to Dominica when he father died she worked as a chorus girl in a touring musical company and then volunteered in a soldiers’ canteen during WWI. In 1920s Paris she was, for a time, under the patronage of the English writer Ford Madox Ford. Perhaps that is too gentle a euphemism but he did seem to be genuinely supportive of her both emotionally and financially for a time. Their relationship is immortalized in her 1939 novel After Leaving Mr. Mackenzie (for his version of the affair see When the Wicked Man (1931)). If you look into the biblical phrase from which that title is derived you might have sense of his take on the whole relationship.

She was thoroughly modern in that she did not cloak the often mercenary nature of men and women at their worst in their pursuit of sex, money or status. Her writing reflected her immense sorrows and losses unflinchingly. In Good Morning, Midnight, Sasha Jansen returns to post WWI Paris, the place where her marriage disintegrated, her husband (whose form of employment is ambigous and fretful) disappeared and her newborn child died. She forms no real attachments, make no real friends, and is viewed suspiciously and antagonistically because she is a woman alone with no visible means of financial support.

In an early scene in the novel, Sasha says in a long interior monologue, while she is being humiliated by a supervisor in the small shop where she works briefly, “You have the right to to pay me four hundred francs a month. That’s my market value, for I am an inefficient member of Society, slow in the uptake, uncertain, slightly damaged in the fray … We can’t all be happy, we can’t all be rich, we can’t all be lucky … There must be the dark background to show up the bright colours.”

Earlier she cries, at the sight of an older balding woman, a prospective customer, fitting various pieces of costume jewellery, combs and feathers to the remains of her thinning hair, while the woman’s daughter impatiently urges her to leave, embarrassed by her vanity perhaps. Sasha bolts from the room and cries senselessly “for all the fools and all the defeated”.

Mistreated, rootless, victimized … these are often words used to describe Rhys’ life and that of her characters (often they appear interchangeable). One can’t help but see the scrawny, abused kitten that Sasha takes in in the novel Good Morning, Midnight as a metaphor for Sasha herself even as the kitten, shooed away by the exasperated Sasha eventually, is almost instantly killed by a taxi.

But Rhys is more than these adjectives. She is brave, wounded by, but unafraid of, society’s judgments, truly fearless. It’s fair to say that the plots and sentiments are disconcertingly similar and bear the stamp of bitter experience. The same lost women seem to haunt every novel and the short stories. Marya’s husband Stephan is imprisoned for fraudulent activities and she is taken under the wing of the well meaning Heidlers in Quartet (1929), a not so veiled nod to to what actually happened to Rhys when her French-Dutch husband was imprisoned in the 1920s. Her affair with Ford began then while he was married.

Julia Martin searches for love after her relationship with Mr. Mackenzie ends (again the lover is patterned on Ford Madox Ford) in After Leaving Mr. Mackenzie (1931). In Voyage in the Dark (1934), the book chronicles the misadventures of Anna Morgan, a West Indian born girl who comes to England and becomes a chorus girl. Tigers are Better Looking (1968), a collection of short stories, depict women living in despair, often recovering from failed romances and too much alcohol.

Only one character that I’ve come across in Rhys’ oeuvre, Antoinette Bertha Cosway in Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) modeled on Bertha Rochester from Jane Eyre, destroys the template by immolating herself while locked in Rochester’s house. And she almost succeeds in destroying Rochester himself. Perhaps this was fitting as this is the book that received the most acclaim for Rhys after a life of relative obscurity.

Rhys’ work remains dark, disturbing and true. Perhaps she suffered too much from what she described as: “The perpetual hunger to be beautiful and the thirst to be loved which is the real curse of Eve.” ~ from the short story “Illusion”, The Left Bank (1927)

One of these artworks isn’t for sale like the others, all of these artworks are kind of the same

Last night I went to an Images Festival talk, Moving Images for Sale, which was pitched as a discussion of the impact of the hot-as-Brueghel-illustrated-hell art market on video, film and interactive computer art. The moderator was Lisa Steele, Creative Director at Vtape, Toronto, and the participants were Chris Eamon, Curator of the Pamela and Richard Kramlich Collection, San Francisco, and Lori Zippay, Executive Director of Electronic Arts Intermix, New York.

As a grant-grown Canuck who had just returned from viewing some of the riches of one of the largest US private art collections, Miami’s Rubell Family Collection, I was, to be frank, intrigued by the ways that the massive art market in the States worked, and was hoping Zippay and Eamon, as high-rolling Yanks, could indulge my shallow interest in the cold hard cash aspect of the video art life. While the conversation ended up tending more to technical conservation issues than my desired money-grubbing ones, there was a terrific case study presented of an artist critiquing the commercial art system even as he participated in it. I thought I’d share it here as an example of some much needed art a la snark.
Continue reading

Mad Lullabies Indeed

Heather O’Neill’s Lullabies for Little Criminals has garnered a great deal of attention, particularly after it was selected as the 2007 winner of CBC’s Canada Reads.

The enormous hype aside and after enthusiastic praise about the book from my partner, there is a genuine frisson of shock in reading something that feels immediate, real, new. That’s what Montreal native O’Neill brings to the book. The misadventures of 12 year old Baby, the pre-teen protagonist being fitfully raised by her heroin junkie father in Montreal hits a nerve even in the reading of the most absurd and strange details of Baby’s life whether it is her time spent in foster homes, in the company of petty criminals on the street or with other children, like Theo, who seem permanently damaged by the lives they have lived.

Supposedly inspired by a similarly sporadic life spent with her father when O’Neill’s mother could no longer manage the care of her three children, she seems to capture life on the street, a life completely unfettered by rules or commonsense on the part of the adults in Baby’s life.

You read with a growing sense of unease as adults (mainly men and boys) notice that Baby is maturing. The casual violence of their language and gestures towards her is unsettling and utterly believable. It reminded me of how vulnerable girls are as the develop into women when even going outside seemed to be fraught with potential peril (or maybe that is more a product of my upbringing in my Hamilton neighborhood?).

It evokes in me the near misses and catastrophes of my own very young sojourns into downtown Hamilton. My mother had a job downtown, I usually accompanied her on Saturdays but often ventured out on my own (at nine! I can’t even imagine it now) and was left to my own devices. I met some unsavoury characters and just barely managed to avoid any real trouble. I had very little street sense but a deep suspicion of people in general which I think was a saving grace.

Although, I am only halfway through the book now, Baby’s gentle acceptance of the bizarre and violent, her seeming naivete is extremely disturbing. It is off putting, even maddening to read. You yearn for an appropriately angry response from her. But reading the “About the Author” section in the back of the book, learning about her real life experiences, hearing her voice as she reads passages from the book on the CBC website (scroll down for the slide show), even merely admiring her photo (she looks like a Julia Margaret Cameron portrait or the young Vanessa Bell, sister of Virgina Woolf) provided with her book – it all fits, seems genuine, naturally created.

 

Whither the Great Canadian (Charter of Rights and Freedoms) Novel?


Yesterday there was a compelling piece in the Toronto Star by UBC poli sci professor Michael D. Wallace on the “enduring mythology of Vimy.” In it, Wallace challenges the commonly held wisdom that Vimy was “the birthplace of the Canadian nation” because it was the first time Canadian troops fought together.

Indeed, Wallace’s op-ed predicted the citation by PM Harper later in the day that Vimy is one of Canada’s key “creation stories”. (Unsurprisingly, Harper, however succinct in id’ing this concept, wasn’t quite as critical about the point as Wallace is.)

While I have great respect for the soldiers who have fought in Canada’s battles, Vimy included, and I can barely imagine the horrors and risks they must have endured (and, in Afghanistan, as recent events remind us, continue to endure) I have to say that I agree with Wallace’s assertion.

The upshot? We need to supplant/expand on the mythology of Vimy and other official narratives with more accurate “creation stories” about our nation. So I say, whither the Great Canadian (Charter of Rights and Freedoms) Novel? Continue reading

Misunderstandings Launches in Toronto!

A friendly reminder that Misunderstandings Magazine will be launching
it’s 6th issue this Friday. Come out to enjoy a night of readings,
drinks and literary fun.

When: Friday, April 13 at 8 pm

Where: Renaissance Café (Danforth just west of Woodbine).

Featuring performances by contributors: Ryan Bird, Susie Petersiel Berg,
Savatore Difalco and Triny Finlay.

Open Stage: yes!

Hope to see you all!

Sincerely,

The Misunderstandings Team

www.misunderstandingsmagazine.com

On waiting for the SCUMploitation double feature

So, I went to see Grindhouse this weekend – you know, that new and much-hyped double feature from Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez. It supposedly pays homage to the nasty, cheesy, 70s-era genre characterized by over-the-top sex, gore and violence.

For the record, the film was my boyfriend’s suggestion. But you know what? Despite being the type of twitchy, gore-averse gal who had to cover my eyes for most of Pan’s Labyrinth, I liked it. Tarantino’s offering, Death Proof, at least. It’s not that I’m a huge Kill Bill fan – haven’t even seen it yet, actually. And it’s not that I’m simply seduced by the director’s surf and girl-group-rich soundtracks (though I do like them an awful lot).

No, the reason I really loved Death Proof is that it featured three smart, cute, strong women beating up a misogynist – to death, in fact. Continue reading