Monthly Archives: January 2008

Descant Contributor’s New Exhibition in Toronto

zsako image

white4.gifwhite4.gif
Balint Zsako, whose stunning portfolio Love Stories appeared in Descant 136: A Trompe L’Oeil Calendar, has an exhibition coming up at the Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art (MOCCA) in Toronto. The public reception for Works from the Bernardi Collection will take place on Friday, February 1st from 7 to 10 p.m. The exhibition runs until April 20th. MOCCA is located at 952 Queen Street West, Toronto.

NowHearThis! in Quill & Quire Vol-74, No-1

quill-janfeb2008cover.jpg

white4.gif

S.W.A.T. (Students, Writers and Teachers), a student outreach program of NowHearThis! has been profiled in the January/February issue of Quill & Quire! Descant Arts & Letters Foundation’s ongoing literacy program has had a very successful response in its inaugural year; S.W.A.T. places writers in Toronto area classrooms for 12 week writing workshops, where they have the chance to engage and inspire students. Read about writer and S.W.A.T. participant Emily Pohl-Weary’s experience in Q&Q’s new issue, out now.

Encounters with Books: Everywhere

bookforweb.jpg

I recently had the great joy of reading Alan Bennett’s book The Uncommon Reader. A celebration of the uncommon reading experience, which surely must not be so uncommon. For isn’t it many a reader who has learned how one book leads to another, how books can rip the world open wide, and how reading indeed is like a muscle? But then this might just be the company I keep. Those kind people who care to befriend a girl with obsessive compulsive reading habits who spends the rest of her time writing stories and then writing blog posts all about the reading.

For we are apparently rather uncommon, me and the company I keep. Britons aren’t reading, Canadians read less than Americans (as noted in the Descant blog a couple of weeks ago). Alan Thicke’s not into books. Also via the Quill and Quire blog, I’m told (and by Steve Jobs no less), that, “Forty percent of the people in the U.S. read one book or less last year. The whole conception [of the Amazon Kindle] is flawed at the top because people don’t read anymore.”

I would argue indeed that the conception of the Kindle is flawed, from top to bottom, but the rest is codswallop. The polls are just wrong, Alan Thicke is an idiot, and Steve Jobs must get out less than I do. Because I’ve been getting out lately and looking around to find that readers are everywhere. That reading is just as common as its ever been, and in a time and place in which “Books” is graffiti, can anything be so dire?

Ridden public transport lately Steve? Have you noticed all the people reading? And they’re reading books, you know, many of them. Which means that when these people left their houses this morning, packing a book in their bag was as essential as putting on shoes. Did you know that reading on transit is so exasperatingly common that in Toronto we’ve even got a blog devoted to it?
Sure there are probably too many reading Jodi Picoult, The Secret or The Da Vinci Code, and I do remember last summer when everybody and his brother had a copy of the new H. Potter. But let us not get into technicalities now. To more people than to others, a book is a book is a book.

And now, let us pretend that a bookstore is a bookstore. Which we all know isn’t actually true, for there are Bookstores and they’re called Independents, but that’s another story for another day. But today, just for now (economics aside), imagine the Big Box bookstore. Those of us who boycott have a variety of reasons for doing so, but the people who venture inside are really only after books. Maybe they’re not bothered about the politics, or the Big Box is the only game in town. But in my experience these stores are often crowded, and never so much in the scented candle aisles as in the places where books are. For it seems that people still like to browse books, touch them, thumb through them, and yes, even buy them (discounted or otherwise).

Have you been listening Steve? And I mean really listening, to conversations. Because people are talking about books. And yes, sometimes they’re talking about Tuesdays With Morrie, but we shall not be discriminatory. Today a book is a book. Though it was only yesterday when I overheard two people spend twenty minutes passionately debating the book versus the film version of The Kite Runner. It was this morning when a stranger in the elevator sang the praises of the title in my hand— The Gathering, which she’d just read, adored, and she promised that I’d like it too. Last month when I was reading Guns Germs and Steel I was interrupted every quarter of an hour by people I’d never seen before who wanted me to know that they’d read it, they’d loved it. And these were individuals who didn’t look bookish in the slightest.

The library near my house is always crowded. The Toronto Public Library system is said to be “thriving”. And yes, modern libraries are about much more than books, but whenever I go there, it’s always three deep in the checkout line. Further, the children’s area is perpetually crowded, with kids for whom coming to select new reads is a weekly ritual, just like it was for me when I was little. When the book spines were golden and the chairs were all small.

And speaking of crowds, have you ever seen what happens to those boxes of free books out front of houses, Steve? You know, when residents are moving, or clearing space, and the books go out in a cardboard box, and at once the swarms descend. They really do. I’m not saying all the books get taken, but free books draw individuals from far and wide. The crappy paperbacks or outdated textbooks might get left behind, but the box will be rummaged through, for within every box there’s the chance of a treasure.

Nearly every middle-aged woman I know is in a book club. Reading is sexy. I want to look like The Bookslut. “What are you reading” starts good conversations. As I type this my husband is beside me reading The Monsters of Templeton by Lauren Groff. On the weekend we walked past a man in a cafe who looked exactly like Salman Rushdie, and then halfway down the street a girl walked by with her nose stuck in Midnight’s Children.

Reading is everywhere. It’s not the company I keep, and I don’t think it’s just because I live in a city. Reading is so widespread that those of us particularly passionate do so like to kvetch that the masses are doing it wrong, but right or wrong, they’re doing it. Go outside and see: a book is a book, and everywhere I turn, someone is reading one somewhere.

2008 Winston Collins/Descant Prize for Best Canadian Poem Short List announced

audience-1.jpg

white4.gif

The Descant Arts & Letters Foundation is pleased to announce the short list for the Second Annual Winston Collins/Descant Prize for Best Canadian Poem.

Descant received well over 100 submissions from talented voices across the country. The finalists are:

Jeff Bien
Stella Body
Wendy Brandts
Michelle Deines
Laurie Graham
Adrienne Gruber
Jeffrey Herrick
Cornelia Hoogland
Julia Kuzeljevich
Laura Lamont
SheLa E. Morrison
Shane Neilson
Kathryn Rogers
Cora Sire
Linda Squires
Celia Ste Croix
Elizabeth Venart
Margo Wheaton
On February 20, 2008 one winner will be awarded $1000, and two honourary mentions will be awarded $250 each. This prize has been established in memory of Winston Collins, writer and enthusiastic teacher of literature at the universities of Cincinnati, Princeton and Toronto. The prize will perpetuate his remarkable talent for encouraging self-expression through writing.
An evening of celebration dedicated to the public announcement of the winner and honourable mentions of the 2008 Descant/Winston Collins Prize for Best Canadian Poem is to be held on February 20th at 6pm. This event will take place at PageWave Graphics [533 College Street, Suite 402 (corner of College and Euclid),
Toronto].

See last year’s winners here.

Thinking about Jane, Anna and Others

I once disgraced myself during a Women’s Studies course at university by claiming that Jane Austen bored me because she seemed so fixated on getting her heroines married off. I can still see the look of utter astonishment and disgust on the professor’s face. Ah, the narrowmindedness of youth … If she could have banished me from the class right there and then, I’m sure she would have done so.

Now, of course, as a committed Austenophile (as my blogs can attest to) I see her six novels in a different manner. But something else is at play here … I see her brilliance and charm as an author but there is another level of poignancy added to my perception of the work.

As I get older, I am reading differently … thinking about love and passion in another way, as a woman with one or two romantic disppointments under my belt, reacting as a mother, and, as a devoted reader.

Doesn’t the happy fate of Austen’s heroines underline Jane’s meager supposed romances and early death (aside from the beautiful fantasy of the film Becoming Jane). There is an underlying sadness for me when I read Austen’s work. I can’t read about Lizzie Bennett (Pride and Prejudice) or Emma Woodhouse (Emma) or Anne Elliot (Persuasion) without thinking but not for you Jane. The real Jane Austen had at least two proposals from would-be suitors, according to the biography Becoming Jane Austen by Jon Spence. And yet, for such an intense and passionate person as she appeared to be, things perhaps didn’t really end the way Jane might have wished for herself … 

When I re-read Anna Karenina last winter I was struck by my conflicting emotions: empathy for Anna as the unhappily married lover of Vronsky but now, also, as the mother of Aloysha whom she must abandon to be with Vronsky. Before my allegiances or feelings of compassion lay in her disappointments with her husband Karenin and then her lover Vronsky. Both of which ultimately cost Anna her life.

The scene where Anna steals into her own family house after she has left her husband so that she might catch a glimpse of Aloysha in his bedroom is heartrending. The servants trying desperately to have her leave before the master arrives, Anna’s attempt to remain with her son, her disasterous recogniton that she may have made a mistake in leaving hiim, Karenin’s icy reception of the unfortunate Anna. Of course, in my mind’s eye I also see Garbo, in all her pale beauty, recreating this scene in the 1935 version of the film.

Tolstoy amazes me … he captures both the sexual passion of illicit love and the passionate devotion that women have for their children so intensely. I could not be so moved had I not had my own child I think.

But this intensity is not restricted to mothers obviously. A few months ago I was listening to the writer David Gilmour on the CBC talking about his latest book The Film Club and his relationship with his son Jesse. He said something to the effect that he felt he could not go on if Jesse was somehow harmed or died. This intrigued me because although, admittedly, I sometimes think this of my daughter and I imagine many mothers feel this too, I rarely hear men speak in this manner. Could he have imagined this sort of emotional response to anyone before Jesse’s birth? I somehow doubt it.

He was probably like me, a overconfident, ill informed such and such who was unable to project beyond her own feelings and pseudo-progressive politics at the time.

The writer Susan Cheever wrote in her memoir Note Found in a Bottle that, as an alcoholic, she “worshipped at the shrine of herself”. Having a child, which she did with some trepidation, transformed her, brought her out of herself, forced her to think of others. I think this self absorption extends to a good many of us (alcoholic or not). I know it does to me.

Of course, having a child is not a prerequisite for enlightment or eliminating self absorption. But for me, it did that to a certain extent.

And I think that is what great writing will do for you … the more you re-read the work (or perhaps the older you get and the more experiences you have), the greater the nuances and levels of emotions it evokes. We should all be so lucky to have that effect on readers.

Encounters with Books: In The Natural World

winter.jpg

I’ve got this bizarre delusion about books in the world. Most of it, I think, due to a phase when I read Annie Dillard’s Pilgrim at Tinker Creek too earnestly, and four times in a row. And ever after I’ve been obsessed with books as an element of the natural environment (for don’t books come from the trees after all?).

Even Tinker Creek itself, Dillard figures, runs through the night as like “a closed book on the shelf continues to whisper to itself its own inexhaustible tale”. In the winter, her reading is sustenance; she fears running low on provisions: “What am I reading? What will I read next? I’m terrified that I’ll run out, that I will read through all I want to, and be forced to learn wildflowers at last, to keep awake.”

In Pilgrim, Books and reading are embedded into the ecosystem. Reading is a part of the seasonal cycle, as Dillard writes of the island where she comes to read in “every month of the year,” where she “straddle[s] the sycamore log over the creek, curling [her] legs out of the water in winter”.

And I think I know what she’s talking about, the reading experience being planted right into the earth, like a root, like a river, like a muskrat. A delusion that may have come about the evening I was reading Pilgrim at Tinker Creek and a ladybug landed on my page, refusing to go away no matter how I poked it, and so I had to read that page over and over again.

One of the great spiritual revelations of my lifetime took place the spring morning I was reading on my front steps, and pink blossoms and maple keys were falling onto my book in such abundance that I had to sweep them off the pages to see what the words said, and for a brief time after that, I knew the answer to every question there ever was.

Which is romantic stuff, all of this. Except that Annie Dillard’s bucolic reading spot was situated near Roanoke Virginia, whose temperature today is listed at 7 degrees, according to The Weather Network. The temperature on my front steps, according to the same, is ten degrees lower, not including the wind chill. If I went out to find a sycamore log to read upon, even with my legs curled, very soon I’d freeze.

Winter shatters my delusion, for no book could ever be planted in this cold cold earth. Or more literally, out in this cold cold air. Which seems like a frivolous thing to whine about, I know, but though I am certainly no pilgrim, so much of my reading does get done out of doors. Particularly in this in-between moments I catch,while I’m standing around waiting for something, be it a bus or a friend. And have you ever tried to turn a page wearing mittens? Gloves? I’ve even mastered reading whilst walking, but reading in mitts just seems impossible.

So reading in the winter becomes an indoor sport. Though in my house, and others I’m sure, conditions are still far from optimum, as the cold leaks in through the walls. As I turn the pages with icy fingers, my nose turning blue, I start longing for The Slanket.

Winter reading only makes me miss the summer. When adventure was just a bike-ride away, involving a picnic blanket and someplace green to read upon. When holiday destinations were just reading-destinations disguised (they call them beaches). Sitting outside reading on my lunch breaks, acquiring freckles on my shoulders. Raindrops falling, spotting the pages before I closed them and dash inside, leaving an ever-lasting reminder of that reading moment imprinted upon my book.

I think a whole summer could be spent reading summer books, but a winter of books about winter would only make me sad. Though you are welcome to disagree with this as you like. Two recent exceptions I can think of are Let the Northern Lights Erase Your Name and The Frozen Thames, majestic and tiny respectively, but icy alike, and both might be read and reread an entire winter long, with no need for resorting to wildflower-learning ever.

Canada (Doesn’t) Reads!

Rexbath1.JPGMore Canadians (31%) than Americans (27%) did not read a single book for pleasure this past year, 2007, according to this sexy Ipsos Reid poll. Isn’t that surprising? It just shows the difference between who gets on TV in our countries. In Canada, the smart people are still disproportionally in the public eye, while in America the stupid have left the shadows of their book-free enclaves and have gotten their own talk shows. It’s Rex Murphy vs. Kelly Ripa. It’s George Stroumboulopoulos vs. Debbie Matenopoulos. It’s Wendy Mesley vs. that-guy-who’s-name-I-can’t-think-of-but-you-know-the-one-yeah-that-guy. And I swear, I just drew those names at random from the two hats I keep around the house containing the names of Canadian and American television personalities on little strips of paper. Dear America, what’s the use of having less dumb people if you put them in charge?

 

But more importantly, by region, the Canadians most likely to read a book are located on the coasts. Why is that? Is it the ocean? Does access to the ocean slow down the pace of life to allow for things like reading for pleasure? I know I always bring a book to the beach. Do coastal Canadians bring a book to their life? (I want some of that! Should I fill my bathtub with saltwater? Play beluga albums? Fling fish about the house?) Or is it that in least one direction there’s nowhere to go? I mean, here in Ontario, I can run around in circles and frequently do. Or is it (East coast) to get away from that horrible music? Men of the Deep, Rita MacNeil, Great Big Sea- um, sorry, I’m going home to read “The Secret”. (Apparently, there are no west coast musicians.) Or is it (West coast) to get away from Bruce Allen? Bruce Allen- um, sorry, I’m going home to read “Eat, Pray, Love”. (Apparently, there are no east coast Bruce Allens.)

 

But more importantly, why are Canadians reading “The Secret” and “Eat, Pray, Love” ? These shouldn’t even count as reading ‘a book’ I’d call up Ipsos to complain, but I don’t want to lower our scores any further. Dear Ippi, never mind.

 

I’d put a list of Best Canadian Books of the Year in this spot, but nobody’s made such a list yet *. Check out all the newspapers. All the newspapers in Canada. They’ll tell you whether “The Bourne Ultimatum” made their number four or number seven spot for Best Film of the year, but nobody’s writing about books these days. I guess that makes sense since nobody’s reading them. Maybe those bookwormy Americans have a list. Oh here’s one- thank goodness for The New York Times: 100 Notable Books of 2007. And among their 50 ‘fiction and poetry’ choices, there’s even a Canadian one- Alice Munro! Who else? If Philip Marchand is right and this was the year of the marketing of Canadian Literature , then somebody needs a spanking. Why are we marketing to ourselves? Haven’t we heard? We don’t read! Let’s get the Americans buying our books. There’s more of them. By percentage and by actual numbers. If  73% of Americans read at least one book a year, lets have it be one of ours. Tell Yann Martel to stop sending those books to Harper. Send them to Bush. Laura, I mean. She used to be a librarian. As you can see from the link, there’s a whole bunch of stuff about books on the White House website. And that’s where I’ll stop because I’m crying.

 

*Just prior to posting this deeply troubled screed I noticed my fellow Descant blogger Kerry Clare (a much smarter Descant blogger- according to Ipsos Reid and people that know me) had drummed up a list from the Globe and Mail. Damn! I thought. Damn! And I’d googled for minutes and hadn’t found a thing. What’s wrong with me? Did I misspell buks again? But then I clicked on her link and ta-da, it’s a you-must-pay-to-read-past-the-first-few-sentences kind of thing. Nice: that the New York Times gives out their book list for free! Sad: that in the year of marketing Canadian Literature a person can’t get help with a helpful list after googling for minutes and minute. That spanking (see above) is looking more and more essential.