Monthly Archives: January 2009

Encounters with books: on reading challenges

challenge.jpg

So many books, so many readers. There is something, I think, about the sheer infinitude of unread books in the world that inspires feats of literary endurance. About the illusionary solitude of the reading experience that drives readers to reach out to one another, and read together. It is an urge similar to but less insane than that towards competitive eating, for example, which also takes a mundane/delightful aspect of ordinary life and exploits its very limits. In both activities, however, gluttony is the rule of the game.

Speaking of gluttony, and how I was perhaps put off reading challenges at an early age: there was a program when I was at school that awarded coupons for personal pan pizzas at Pizza Hut to students who read a certain number of books in a month. This is the last reading challenge that I remember taking part in. I remember that the pizzas were really small. Also, that obtaining the coupon was less of a challenge than it was supposed to be, because I was as voracious a reader as I was an eater.

So there is that. And then there are the Guinness World Record-setting reading challenges, which certainly shrink the personal pan ones down to size. January 27 was Family Literacy Day, an initiative by ABC Canada and their sponsor Honda. An attempt was made across Canada to set the World Record for number of adults and children reading together, and early forecasts indicate success– over 190,000 participants registered to read Munschworks 2 and break the 2006 US record of 79,000.

It is online, however, where reading challenges abound (and without even the promise of tiny pizza or world records as reward). Read a self-confessed reading challenge junkie’s addiction outlined by Sassymonkey to get a better idea of the phenomenon, which apparently comes with its own structures, rules, and need for organization via spreadsheet. She links to numerous challenges out there, including The Short Story Reading Challenge, Africa Reading Challenge, and the sort of confusing What’s in a Name? Challenge (“read one book each that has a colour, animal, first name, place, weather event and plant in its title”). And if there’s a challenge idea out there that no one else has thought of yet, then go on and set it for yourself.

At The Booker Club, Guardian blogger Sam Jordison is busy “Looking Back at the Booker”, rereading the prize’s less-remembered previous winners. Melanie and Alexis are Roughing It In the Books, having challenged themselves to read/reread the entire New Canadian Library. Back in August, blogger Steven Beattie set himself a substantial reading/blogging challenge when he decided to read and write about 31 Short Stories in 31 Days. John Mutford of The Book Mine Set spearheads The Canadian Book Challenge. Challenge yourself to read Canada Reads. And then there are all the prize short lists, longlists, backlists, and those 1000 Books You Must Read Before You Die.

There are bloggers whose margins are absolutely cluttered with “buttons” of all the reading challenges in which they’ve partaken. Overwhelming, I think, as a meandering reader who likes floating easy from one book to another. But apparently the challenge itself is the key, and not necessarily completion. Sassymonkey reveals, “To be perfectly honest I’ve never successfully finished a challenge I’ve started.” Which really isn’t anything to get anxious about, as long as you imagine that time is as unlimited as the books are.

WRITERS’ SANDBOX (National Post)

descant-sandbox.jpg

Journalist Mark Medley has started a special feature in the National Post called ‘The Ecology of Books’ … Descant is prominently featured in his recent focus on literary journals (Jan 24/09)

Read the feature here

10,000 Reasons Not To Write

Pic060.jpg
slug.png

There are many reasons why a writer need not write. Thousands of them; ten thousand even. My work’s no good. It will never get published. No one will read it. I’ll never make money from it. I have nothing new to say. I’ll write when I retire.

Here’s one reason to trump anything your doubting mind can come up with. Studies have consistently shown that excellence at a complex task (such as fiction writing) requires a minimum level of practice, and experts have settled on 10,000 hours as the magic number for true expertise. Malcolm Gladwell, in his book, Outliers: The Story of Success. (In statistics, an outlier is an observation that is numerically distant from the rest of the data). Talent, that indefinable factor-X, will get a person through certain doors, such as a creative writing program, but beyond that whether or not a person will achieve brilliance as a writer will depend on the sheer number of practice hours he or she labors. In study after study (of composers, basketball players, fiction writers, chess players, master criminals) this number comes up again and again. Ten thousand hours is equivalent to roughly three hours a day, or 20 hours a week of practice over 10 years. No one has yet found a case in which true world-class expertise was accomplished in less time. The brain requires this period of training to assimilate, to rewire, and to forge new patterns which display true mastery.

I find this idea sensible at an intuitive level. Although I have some questions about what exactly counts as practice for fiction writing. Does thinking count, I wonder. Much of my time as a writer goes into thinking about what inspires me and what I want to say about a theme even before I begin writing. And while I am writing, I think about what to add or edit, sometimes waking up from a vivid dream with a great idea. So do my dreams count toward the 10,000 hours?

Artistic geniuses, such as Lewis Carroll, Dostoevsky and Van Gogh had a condition called hypergraphia. They had an obsessive need to write or paint. In the lives of many writers, we find some degree of this compulsion to write—perhaps not compulsive enough to be classified as a condition, but certainly a driving ambition. Most writers keep journals and notebooks where they record minute details of daily life. All of which, I suppose, contributes toward that magical 10,000 hours.

Likewise, some writers exhibit hyperlexia, or at least, a precocious ability to read. And all writers learn their craft primarily by reading analytically literature that they admire (See Francine Prose’s book Reading Like A Writer). Each great work of literature is a free manual on the craft of writing. So then, does reading analytically count toward my 10,000 hours of practice?

Then there is the matter of age. Writing, unlike sports, requires a certain level of experience under one’s belt — we all know child actors, young millionaires even, but how many 12 year-old prodigies can you name that have written works of great fiction? Great writing requires deep contemplation, a maturity and insight about life, living and relationships. So which parts of my life’s experiences can be included in that magic 10,000?

I am told that the average writer in Canada is in his mid-fifties when he first gets published. And given the level of maturity that writing well requires, generally a writer begins writing in earnest later in life. Suppose a person waits until retirement to begin his or her writing career. By the time his brain has figured out all the intricacies of writing well (which require 10,000 hours) then he or she may be 75-80 before he is fit to be published. Given an average life expectancy of 75, is it worth even starting then for a man or woman of 65?

Here is where a belief in reincarnation comes in handy. In the Bhagwad Geeta, Lord Krishna tells his doubting student Arjuna that none of his practice will go to waste; he will continue in his next life where he will have left off. This is how reincarnationists explain prodigies like Mozart, who composed the opera, La Finta, in 1768 when he was 12. Mozart carried over the rewards of his practice from his previous life or lives and built upon them till he reached outlier status.

Yes I should put in my quota of writing today. But look how chilly/warm/quiet/lively it is outside. Jeez, and I haven’t done any laundry in days. Oprah has a really interesting … Shut up and write!